| The Germans had set their foot on the African continent
courtesy not only to the Italians. It is proper to mention that the
French also helped the enemy to entrench in that part of the world.
France's surrender in 1940 practically gave to the Axis powers vast
areas of the French North Africa, French West Africa, and French
Equatorial Africa. With time the leader of the Free French, General
Charles de Gaulle, managed to subordinate most of the territories of
the
French possessions in the West and Equatorial Africa, but the régime in
Vichy still held the French North Africa - Morocco, Algeria and
Tunisia.
Also in the French West Africa in their hands remained its biggest port
Dakar in Senegal, which simultaneously was a well-armed fortress and a
big navy base.
After the fall of France the British attached a big
importance to the French navy. They were afraid that magnificent modern
ships of their yesterday allies would be seized by the Germans. Whereas
the French navy commanders saw in the Royal Navy solely a competitor in
the struggle for the control over seas and oceans. That is why in June
1940 they stood aside understanding not, that this way they were
helping
hitlerite Germany.
At that time a strong French squadron (including three
battleships and a heavy cruiser) anchored at Mers-el-Kebir near Oran in
Algeria. When the attempts to induce the French admirals to join the
British fleet failed, the British carried out a hastily prepared
operation Catapult. That operation foresaw seizing,
immobilizing
and, if necessary, even sinking French ships. The most important part
of
that operation became the attack on Mers-el-Kebir on 3 July 1940. The
attack was carried out by a relatively smaller squadron based in
Gibraltar, and it was preceded by ultimate proposal to join the British
forces against the Axis or to evacuate French ships to French ports
overseas. When that proposal was rejected with contempt, British ships
shelled the port from their heavy guns. Out of four big French ships
only one managed to get to Toulon. Almost 1300 French sailors were
killed. The commander-in-chief of the French navy, Admiral Jean
François
Darlan, ordered the rest of the fleet to attack and sink British ships.
He even suggested the Italians a joint raid on Alexandria. Thus he
almost caused a French-British war. Fortunately Marshal Philippe Pétain
himself stopped his aspirations.
Therefore the matter of an occupation of Dakar, from
where one could control communication routes in the South Atlantic, had
been growing to the level of a big problem. Already on 7 July 1940
British torpedo-bombers attacked Dakar and damaged the modern
battleship Richelieu
anchored in its roadstead. The British prime-minister, Sir Winston
Spencer Churchill, also talked about Dakar with de Gaulle and insisted
on a joint, ardent attack. He assumed that French participation in such
an expedition would soften the stance of the local French governor and
French commanders. This is how de Gaulle noted Churchill's words in
that
matter:
We must, he said to
me, together gain control of Dakar. For you it is capital. For if
the business goes well, it means that large French forces are brought
back into the war. It is very important to us. For to be able to use
Dakar as a base would make a great many things easier in the hard
Battle
of the Atlantic. And so, having conferred with the Admiralty and the
Chiefs of Staff, I am in a position to tell you that we are ready to
assist in the expedition. We mean to assign to it a considerable naval
force. But we would not be able to leave this force on the coast of
Africa for long. The necessity of bringing it back to help in covering
England, as well as in our operations in the Mediterranean, demands
that
we should do things very quickly. That is why we do not agree with your
proposal for landing at Konakry and proceeding slowly across the bush -
which would oblige us to keep our ships in the neighbourhood for months.
(...)
Then Mr. Churchill,
colouring
his eloquence with the most picturesque tints, set to work to paint to
me the following picture: Dakar wakes up one morning, sad and
uncertain. But behold, by the light of the rising sun, its inhabitants
perceive the sea, to a great distance, covered with ships. An immense
fleet! A hundred war or transport vessels! These approach slowly,
addressing messages of friendship by radio to the town, to the navy, to
the garrison. Some of them are flying the Tricolour. The others are
sailing under the British, Dutch, Polish, or Belgian colours. From this
Allied force breaks away an inoffensive small ship bearing the white
flag of parley. It enters the port and disembarks the envoys of General
de Gaulle. These are brought to the Governor. Their job is to convince
him that if he lets you land the Allied fleet retires, and that nothing
remains but to settle, between him and you, the terms of his
cooperation. On the contrary, if he wants a fight, he has every chance
to be crushed. [1]
In his truly adventurous career Sir Winston was among
others also a novelist and that obviously reflected on his political
eloquence. De Gaulle wrote that he had, of course, dismissed the
"seductive ornaments" of the British prime-minister. [1] Nevertheless he accepted Churchill's
proposals because, and it is completely clear, he himself believed in
such a colourful picture. The preparations started and on 23 November
1940 the so planned operation had commenced to de Gaulle's utmost
disappointment:
As for the British, their
squadron was not destined to include all the ships of which Mr.
Churchill had spoken at first. It was finally composed of two
old-fashioned battleships - the Barham and the Resolution
- four cruisers, the aircraft carrier Ark Royal, some
destroyers
and a tanker. In addition, three transports would bring, in case of
need, two battalions of marines under the command of Brigadier Irwin,
with apparatus for landing. On the other hand, a Polish brigade, which
at first was to have taken part in the affair, had been dropped. It
looked as if the General Staff, less convinced than the Prime Minister
of the importance, or else of the chances, of the enterprise, had
whittled down the resources envisaged at the start. [ 1]
With all due respect for Gen. de Gaulle it is worth to mention that he
had put too much of confidence in foreign forces and resources. The
expedition ended in a total confusion. The fortress, commanded by the
capitulationists loyal to Pétain, answered with fire. The Richelieu
was damaged again, but so were both British battleships. After two days
of pointless fights the Allied expedition retreated having not achieved
its objectives. To de Gaulle it was not just a military defeat; it was
above all a serious political setback. The British lost their hearts
for
joint with the French operations of that sort, and the mess in Syria
only confirmed them in such a view.
And so, when on 7 November 1942 all the Anglo-Saxon
radio-stations were broadcasting all the day round the mysterious
words:
"Robert arriving", neither de Gaulle nor any of his soldiers and
sailors
knew what the meaning of those words was. And they meant that huge
American forces were landing on the coasts of Morocco and Algeria. The
leader of the Free French however had learnt about it from the official
press releases. And it was not even Churchill, who arranged keeping
that
matter in secret from the most interested of the Allied leaders. It was
the president of the United States, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who
dearly hated de Gaulle. Simultaneously on that occasion he wanted to
eliminate French influence from certain strategically important areas
of
the world.
The author of the monumental work The Second World
War, John Frederic Charles Fuller, wrote that
strategically, there can
be
little doubt that the invasion of North Africa should have preceded the
Battle of el Alamein, because by direct threatening Rommel's base at
Tripoli as well as his sea communications it would have compelled him
to
look in two directions. Also, there can be no doubt whatever that the
nearer to Tripoli the Allied forces landed, the more distracting would
this threat become. Both these points were considered and both had to
be
abandoned because of shortage of landing craft. [ 2]
General George Marshall, Chief of Staff of the US Army, which made him
the actual supreme commander of the American armed forces, on the same
question wrote:
It was desired to carry
out
the operation early in the fall, but it was necessary to delay until
November in order to receive a large number of craft from the
shipyards.
(...)
It was urgently desired to make initial landings to the east of Algiers
or Bone, Philippevile, and possibly Tunis, but the lack of shipping and
of landing boats and aircraft-carriers at the time made the procedure
impracticable. [ 3]
The aircraft carriers at that time were engaged in the battles in the
Pacific Ocean. Moreover, the landing operation was complicated by the
British protest against landing east of Algiers: the invasion fleet had
to be covered by the British ships and the Imperial Staff was afraid to
send them too close to Sicily and Sardinia, from where they could be
easily bombed by the Italian air forces.
At that time the battle of el-Alamein was won and
Rommel's forces were in rout, when the crafts and vessels of the
invasion fleet started disembarking troops on the western and northern
coasts of Africa, near Casablanca, Algiers and Oran. Some troops made
all the way from the United States; they were commanded by the
energetic
but controversial General George Patton. Other troops started from
Great
Britain in two groups: American and Anglo-American. They were under the
command of an American, whose name at that time was rather unknown -
General Dwight David Eisenhower.
The hitlerite command, although surprised, reacted
swiftly, according to the infallible so far scenarios of the lightning
war. They activated an airlift, which was bringing 1000 soldiers a day
from Italy to Tunisia. Eisenhower faced a dilemma: to conduct a
gradually mounting operation, whose outcome was still uncertain, or to
resort to immediate counter-actions despite of increased risk. He
properly chose the latter. On 11 November, from the bridgeheads taken
on
the first day of the invasion near Algiers, he threw landing troops far
eastward, straight to Bone and supported it with an airborne landing in
the hinterland, near Souk el-Arba. On 25 November advanced units from
the American 1st Army were already in Medjez el-Bab, fifty kilometres
from Tunis.
Meanwhile in Algiers were boiling controversies between
the Americans and the French, between the Americans and the British,
and
first of all among the French themselves. Each Anglo-Saxon partner
simply tried to get rid of the French on its own. But it was not easy -
the French ruled in those areas since long; they knew the country,
people and habits, and without them the administration of the whole
territory would be complicated. So there was an attempt to replace the
French by other French. Roosevelt wanted to bring in place of the hated
de Gaulle another French General - Henri Giraud, famous for his
daredevil escape from the German captivity. When that manoeuvre failed,
the Americans with behemoth awkwardness backed Admiral Darlan - a
collaborationist and the Vichyite governor of North Africa, who changed
his political orientation overnight. Yet that manoeuvre had also
finished tragically: at the end of December Darlan was shot dead by a
young fanatic linked to the rightist stream of the resistance movement.
The Germans reacted to the Allied landing in North
Africa with occupation of the thereto non-occupied departments of
France, which were under the Vichyite administration and had some
appearance of sovereignty. During that action the sailors from the
ships
anchored in Toulon scuttled their ships. Without a use, without
resistance, without inflicting any losses on the enemy, in a gesture of
pathetic and senseless protest there perished three modern battleships,
eight cruisers, seventeen destroyers, sixteen submarines and about
seventy auxiliary vessels. De Gaulle resented that most pitiful and
sterile suicide imaginable; [1] one can
only speculate how much damage to the enemy could have caused that
formidable fleet, if it had sailed in the sea.
On 23 January 1943 the British forces that continued
the
pursuit after Rommel from el-Alamein entered Tripolis. The Libyan
capital welcomed them to the torrential rains. On the other side the
Americans were also marching in the rain typical for that part of the
world and the time of the year. It became obvious, that an immediate
taking of Tunis was impossible. In those conditions it was easier to
the
Germans to supply their troops by air from Italy, than to the Allies by
roads from Algiers. Their supply routes stretched over 450km, and were
running across the beds of seasonal rivers and the desert turned into
mud. Meanwhile Ernst Rommel withdrew his forces from Libya to the
Mareth
Line - the system of fortifications the French had built to defend the
eastern border of Tunisia from the Italians. The area of the fascist
domination, which barely two months before stretched from the Atlantic
Ocean to Alexandria, had shrunk dramatically. In fact the Germans and
Italians held only a part of Tunisia. Rommel's troops on the Mareth
Line
were well-entrenched, but the American forces coming from the west were
already reaching Gafsa and the Gulf of Gabes, and menaced to cut off
Rommel's troops retreating from the east from the Germano-Italian
troops
occupying Tunisia under the command of General Jürgen von Arnim. So
Rommel made a remarkable manoeuvre: with a part of his forces he turned
against the Americans, blasted through the Kasserine pass and took
Tebessa. This way he disrupted the communication between the two
parallel American divisions. Yet on 23 February Rommel's counter-attack
was halted and he had to withdraw. And on 6 March he suffered another
defeat when the counter-attack of the other part of his forces, driven
against the British 8th Army, was literally rolled over in the
approaches to the Mareth Line near Medenine.
So, remarkable manoeuvres did not help much to Rommel,
but he could feel safe behind the Mareth Line, whose left flank reached
the sea and the right flank was built in the Matamata Hills,
inaccessible to the armour; the only accessible pass, Foum Tatathouine,
was strongly fortified. Since 23 February 1943 Rommel could officially
call himself a commander-in-chief, as he was formally made the
commander
of the Army Group Africa. It consisted of von Arnim's 5th
Armoured Army and the Italian 1st Armoured Army (Gen. Giovanni Messe).
He did not enjoy his new post too long. Recalled by Berlin, he flew
away
on 9 March having left the command to von Arnim. Apparently Adolf
Hitler
realised that the Axis forces in Africa were doomed and he decided at
least to save this worthy commander. And so he had saved, at least
partly, Rommel's legend by extricating him from the inevitable defeat.
The commander of the British 8th Army, General Bernard
Law Montgomery, did not plan to bump his head against the Mareth Line
built along a natural, 15m-deep tectonic ditch. On 20 March he launched
an operation genuine in its design. The XXX Corps with a part of its
forces attacked the line from the front and bound its defences in
fights; simultaneously the New Zealand 2nd Division supported by a tank
brigade moved into Foum Tatathouine, where during a 250km-long march
they met French troops arriving from the Lake Chad, outflanked the
Mareth Line and struck against its rears. This manoeuvre was covered by
the air forces, which were literally hunting any noteworthy object.
With the British troops in its rears the Mareth Line
became useless and von Arnim decided to pull his whipped troops out to
the new defence position along the seasonal river Wadi Akarit to
rebuild
the defences. However they were overran as early as on 6 April, and the
next day the 8th Army, marching from the east, and the American 1st
Army, marching from the west, joined hands near Gafsa. On 19 April
Montgomery ordered to attack Enfidaville, where Messe tried to build
another defence line, and on 3 May American tanks took Mateur. On 6 May
started the general attack of the Allied forces on the last Axis
bridgehead in Tunisia. They were under the command of Gen. Harold
Alexander recalled from Burma. On 7 May Bizerta was taken, and on 8 May
the British 6th Armoured Division was thrown to the last assault. Its
commander, Gen. Alan Morehead, wrote of it:
They broke clean through
to
Hammamet inside the next ten hours. They roared past German airfields,
workshops, petrol and ammunition dumps and gun positions. They did not
stop to take prisoners - things had gone far beyond that. If a comet
had
rushed down that road it could hardly have made a greater impression.
The Germans were now entirely dazed. Wherever they looked British tanks
seemed to be hurtling past. (...)
The German generals gave up
giving orders since they were completely out of touch with the people
to
whom they could give orders, who were diminishing every hour. (...)
In a contagion of doubt and
fear the German army turned tail and made up the Cape Bon roads looking
for boats. When on the beaches it became apparent to them at last that
there were no boats - nor any aircraft either - the army became a
rabble. [4]
The Germans, and the more so the Italians, could not afford their own
version of Dunkirk to save at least a part of their troops. The end
came
on 12 May 1943. On that day 250,000 German and Italian soldiers marched
into captivity.
- Ch. de Gaulle,
The Complete War Memoirs of Charles de Gaulle
- J. F. C. Fuller, Second
World War 1939-45. Strategical and tactical overview
- G. C. Marshall, The
Papers of George Catlett Marshall
- A. Morehead, End of Africa, 1943
|