|
Before the dawn on 31 September 1942 Erwin Rommel
struck
against the British positions around el-Alamein - a town in close
approaches to Alexandria. The German command tried to develop recent
successes and through the final conquest of Egypt deprive the Allies of
the last stronghold in that part of the world, the last bridgehead in
the war for the Mediterranean. The country on the Nile constituted a
very important materiel subsidiary and area of troops' concentration.
Occupation of Egypt would open the gates to the Middle East before the
invaders. Then the Germans could easily convince Turkey, menaced from
the Balkans and from Syria, to abandon her neutrality and turn against
the Allies. The only order, which could be issued at el-Alamein was
therefore short: "Not a single step back." Because any step back could
mean a defeat of unpredictable consequences.
The commander-in-chief of the Allied forces in the
Middle East was at that time Gen. Harold Alexander, who just arrived
from Burma and replaced Gen. Claude Auchinleck; whereas the command of
the 8th Army fighting in the desert was entrusted to Gen. Bernard Law
Montgomery - thereto the commander of one of the divisions prepared in
Great Britain to repulse German invasion. The defence positions were
conveniently situated along the 60km-long front between the sea and
Qattara Depression. Unusual geological conditions rendered the use of
vehicles in the depression impossible and a way around it was
completely
out of question - the Qattara Depression stretches for miles and miles
into the wildest desert. It falls down to 70m below the sea level and
is
filled with quicksand and salt bogs. In those conditions the British
did
not have the problem of flanks, for they were well defended by the
nature.
Nevertheless, some Rommel's tanks managed to break
through minefields. The attack was made by the Panzergruppe Afrika
comprised of two armoured and one motorized divisions, as well as the
Italian XX Corps comprised of two armoured divisions. So, those were
substantial forces. Montgomery could throw against them only two
armoured divisions and an armoured brigade. But the excellent
organization of the anti-tank defence did not let the Axis forces to
encircle the main, northern, grouping. In face of mounting losses and
breakdown of the Italian troops on 3 September Rommel ordered a
withdrawal. His retreat to the initial positions was accompanied by
fierce counter-attacks of the British. On 7 September the situation was
in general restored to the state prior to 31 August. Yet the hitlerite
command did not know, that the 8th Army had been intensively
strengthened; reinforcements for it had literally poured.
Meanwhile on the supply route from Italy to Rommel's
forces in Africa there was a little island of Malta. Its fast defence
was not broken by almost 2000 air raids carried out till the autumn
1942. The lone island stuck like a splinter in the system of the
Italo-German communications between Europe and North Africa. As they
strove to achieve the final success in Egypt, the Germans abandoned
plans to seize Malta in a major amphibious operation and diverted all
the forces to the desert theatre. It was their grave mistake. And the
Italian navy was not able to provide efficient protection to the ships
carrying supplies to the Axis African forces, although Benito Mussolini
gave solemn assurances in this matter to Rommel, who visited Rome on
the
way to Berlin. [1]
It is worth to mention that the Regia Marina
was
not successful in the fights with the Royal Navy in the Mediterranean.
On 19 July 1940 off the Crete a British squadron sank the Italian
cruiser Bartolomeo Colleoni. On 12 October the same year three
Italian ships were lost off Malta. On 11 November British torpedo
planes
in a night attack literally decimated the Italian naval forces deployed
in Taranto; seriously damaged were three battleships, of which one
never
returned to active service, and two cruisers. Also there were blown up
fuel dumps and the base of hydroplanes was destroyed. On 27 November a
strong British convoy sailing from Gibraltar to Alexandria repelled
without casualties persistent attacks of a strong Italian squadron;
heavy damages were inflicted to the battleship Vittorio Veneto,
a cruiser and a destroyer. On 9 February 1941 a strong British squadron
from Gibraltar undetected approached Genoa, bombarded the city and
demolished the port. On 27-29 March 1941 off the Cape Matapan was
fought
a battle in defence of a British convoy with supplies for Greece. The
Italian navy lost three cruisers and one destroyer; the British
achieved
this success thanks to the radar used for the first time in the sea
warfare. Simultaneously with the land operations in Africa there were
completely destroyed Italian naval forces in the Red Sea and Indian
Ocean. Survived only one gunboat, which managed to get as far as to
Japan.
Of course the British and the Greeks also lost some
ships, especially in their light forces, during the evacuation of Crete
but that did not improve the combat spirit of the Italian navy. Just
like it could not improve after seizure of the ships of the weak and
tiny Yugoslav navy. In 1942, the critical year of the defeats suffered
on every war theatre, the convoys going on the route Gibraltar - Malta
-
Egypt suffered heavy losses, but the communication along that route had
never been severed. The Italian admiralty simply could not exploit such
grave turns in the strategic situation.
At the end of 1941 in the Mediterranean appeared first
German submarines. They sank the aircraft carrier Ark Royal
going
to Singapore and the battleship Barham. Also an attack of
Italian so-called live torpedoes in Alexandria brought substantial
damages to two British battleships. But those actions could not stop
the
energetic British offensive against the convoys sailing between Italy
to
Africa. On 8 November 1941 the British sank an entire Italian convoy of
seven ships. On 22 March 1942 in the Gulf of Sidra a squadron of
British
light cruisers in another battle in defence of another convoy with
supplies for Malta repelled the Italian squadron comprised of a
battleship and heavy and light cruisers. In the summer convoys to Malta
suffered heavy losses but nevertheless the island's supplies were
always
satisfactory, and the Italian navy did not dare to challenge the enemy
openly. No doubt Italian admirals got in those years a serious
inferiority complex.
In such circumstances Rommel, already promoted to a
Field Marshal, could not rely on Mussolini's promises. After all he
could not rely even on his own leadership. He understood the
significance of taking Egypt better than Adolf Hitler and his aides. In
Berlin they promised him among others to send in a regiment of the
newest tanks Pz.Kpfw.T-VI Tiger and a brigade of the newest
six-barrelled mortars Nebelwerfer, but he realised that they
would not arrive in time. After all even he himself was not to come
back
in time. The battle pivotal for the African campaign started without
him. During his absence in command was Gen. Georg von Stumme.
Meanwhile the British in September and October had
substantially strengthened their forces. Eventually on the
Germano-Italian side had to fight eight infantry and four armoured
divisions, altogether about 100,000 men and 600 tanks - half of that
Italian. On the British side were concentrated three corps - X, XIII
and
XXX - altogether seven infantry divisions, three armoured divisions and
seven armoured brigades. They numbered 150,000 men and over 1000 tanks.
Moreover Montgomery had finally built up superiority in the air forces.
In 1937 Italy was yet the world's first air power; in 1942 once
formidable Italian machines became obsolete junks, which used to be
shot
down like ducks. On 9 October British air forces launched massive
bombings of the enemy rears. The ports, airfields and supply bases in
Italy were bombed from the airfields located in Great Britain, and
Rommel's bases, roads and transports were bombed from airfields in
Egypt. As many as 700 bombers took part in it; simultaneously the
fighters wiped the enemy air forces from the sky.
Contrary to the British traditions, Montgomery
personally met his officers and soldiers before the battle, and
explained them the goal, sense and significance of the pending contest.
He was not a typical English general. He wore the uniform of his own
style and did not drink or smoke. He was reputed by saying once to Sir
Winston Spencer Churchill: I do not smoke or drink, and I exercise
every day, and I am one-hundred percent fit, to which Churchill
calmly puffed his cigar, sipped his brandy and replied: I smoke and
drink, never exercise, and I am three-hundred percent fit. [2] However, in spite of his ostensible
abstinence, soldiers of the 8th Army liked their "Monty". They were
bound to love him after he led them to the victory.
On 23 October 1942 as many as 900 pieces of artillery
opened fire at the Germano-Italian positions near el-Alamein. After the
twenty-minutes barrage, exactly at ten o'clock in the evening, the
troops of the XIII and XXX Corps went to the battle. Tens of thousands
of mines were laid in front of them, so engineers were going in the
first lines. For the first time in the African campaign they used the
electromagnetic mine detectors - 500 devices. After them followed the
infantry; in the battle of el-Alamein Montgomery reversed the common
principle that infantry followed the tanks. After all it was said that
he trusted infantry more than tanks, and he had such outstanding
infantry divisions like the 9th Australian, 4th Indian, 2nd New Zealand
or 51st Scottish Highland. By 5:30 next morning they made in the
minefields two corridors where to the battle went two tank brigades
from
the X Corps.
London with the utmost anxiousness expected news about
the development of the battle of el-Alamein. According to the historian
Fred Majdalany,
the man who seemed the
least concerned was General Montgomery. For him ten o'clock was not
only
H-hour for the second battle of Alamein, but his usual bedtime in or
out
of battle. As soon as he knew the attack was on its way he went to bed.
Everything possible had been arranged. There was nothing more he could
do. The battle must take its course and he must wake up fresh to meet
the problems and decisions of the next day. [ 2]
And on the next day the infantry from the XXX Corps was consolidating
its positions in the northern sector of the front, where it took its
first objective - a range of hills called Miteiriya. The tanks were
moving on. Farther to the south the advance of the XIII Corps stalled
and another tank brigade was detached to the north to develop the
successful advance there. On 25 October Gen. Stumme, while riding with
his staff officers in a car to a German light division pressed by the
Australians, got under the artillery fire, fell off the car and died of
a heart stroke. Years later John Frederic Charles Fuller wrote about
him, that he committed the egregious error of spreading his troops
evenly along the whole front, instead of holding it lightly and
concentrating his armour well in rear in readiness to counter-attack.
[3]
Meanwhile Rommel was vacationing in the Alps, in
Simmering. Hitler recalled him urgently and ordered him to return to
Africa. Rommel arrived there next day with a special plane. He promptly
sent his tanks to several counter-attacks, but none of them succeeded.
He renewed his efforts on 28 October, but he had to detach substantial
armoured forced to aid the light division surrounded by the
Australians.
It managed to break out of the trap, but on 1 November the XXX Corps,
supported by heavy tanks, struck again. In hard fights it overcame last
minefields. The point of gravity of the battle shifted beyond the lines
of the German defence. On 1-3 November two armoured divisions from the Panzergruppe
Afrika and two armoured divisions from the British X Corps fought a
battle near the hamlet Tel el-Aqqaqir. The Germans lost it entirely and
they also lost well-fortified defence positions. On 2 November Rommel
in
the letter to his wife, to whom he used to write often and frankly,
wrote:
Dearest Lu,
Very heavy fighting again, not going well for us. The enemy, with his
superior strength, is slowly levering us out of our position. That will
mean the end. You can imagine how I feel. Aie raid after air raid after
air raid. [ 4]
Shortly before, that skilful tactician and the author of a work on
applying principles of the sea warfare in the desert fights [5] gained the nickname "Desert Fox". But now the
British air forces dominated the battlefield having against itself only
weak units of the anti-aircraft artillery. So on 3 November Rommel
ordered the retreat. He left to its fate his right wing, namely the
Italians, and forces his whipped Panzergruppe divisions to an
exhausting march westward. And thus the "Desert Fox" lost the biggest
battle of the African campaign. After all historians say that the
retreat was done skilfully too.
The casualties the Axis forces suffered in the battle
of
el-Alamein were very heavy. They lost 60,000 killed, wounded, MIA's and
taken prisoners, in this at least 35,000 Germans. They also lost over
500 tanks, 400 guns, and of course thousands of vehicles. The British
lost about 13,500 dead, wounded and MIA's, as well as over 400 tanks.
Majdalany has meticulously counted the percentage of the Allied losses:
58% of them were English and Scots, 22% Australians, 10% New
Zealanders,
6% South Africans, and 4% Greeks and French. [2]
On 13 December the British troops from the 8th Army entered again into
Tobruk. On 20 December they reached Benghazi. Since then the pace of
their pursuit substantially slowed down - it was not until a month
later
that they took Tripolis. Nevertheless the fates of the war had clearly
turned the tables: on the other end of the African continent at that
time unfolded more offensive operations, and at the same time on the
Volga developed the events, which were bound to bring the most fatal to
the Germans battle of the Second World War.
- A. Kesselring, A
Soldier's Record
- F. Majdalany, The
Battle of El Alamein: Fortress in the Sand
- J. F. C. Fuller, Second
World War 1939-45. Strategical and tactical overview
- E. Rommel, Rommel's
Papers
- E. Rommel, Rommel
and His Art of War
|